Rainbow UFOlogy

[lake]

Rainbow UFOlogy

The Nevanlinna-Pick UFO Paradigm

icha 25, 1951, Lubbock rinerse (TX)
harkels, 26, 1980, Rendlesham rinerse (UK)
tir 13, 1997, kir rinerse (AZ)
erind 8, 2008, Stephenville rinerse (TX)

Rainbow UFOlogy, where UFOs are studied according to control theory, the objective being to find the transfer function, that is, the mathematical representation of the relation between the input and output based on the differential equations describing the UFO phenomena. The Cassini interpretation takes UFOs as inputs to the system, while the XViS interpretation takes UFOs as the output of the system."



The Stephenville-2008c exercise had the following components: a beam projected from the ground in a way as to give the impression that it was
projected from the object, a PSV (unmanned Akrij Type) at one end of the beam, a military radar station at the other end, a tactical command and control center, as the controller, and a power amplifier to drive the PSV. The objective is to control the position of the sensed end of the beam as per the reaction of unaware observers. In this setup, neither the radar station operator nor the crew of the scrambled jets were aware of the fact that an exercise was being executed.



Consider the usual UFO-Observer system with a transfer function P and controller transfer function C. It is hypothesized that P is not fixed but belongs to some set P'. The robust stability problem is to find, if one exists, a controller C that achieves internal stability for every P in P'. We would like to know two things: conditions on P' for C to exist and a procedure to construct such C. In this generality the robust stability problem remains unsolved.



Phoenix-1997a was a closed-loop system in which the inputs (the UFOs used were PSV-25S flown over the transect Nevada-Arizona) were determined, at least in part, by certain responses of the system. However, the particular setup of the Phoenix-1997b experiment used a different approach. The flyover used the transect from ACC Dyess AFB to AETC Vance AFB, using both a PSV-MilOrb-3377 and a PSV-2035 of type Presence, and the output being analysed were the reaction of the crew from jets scrambled by Carlswell NAS.

PSV Presence was made visible to radars and to scrambled fighters from Carlswell NAS in order to test collision avoidance systems. As required by the experimenters, the regulator maintained the physical variable at some constant value in the presence of perturbances (the jets scrambled by Carlswell NAS). Now, what would happen if the crew of the PSV were kept ignorant to the fact they were being chased by jets which were not controlled by the experimenters? Could we gain any insight about the transfer function of this system that we could apply to the Lubbock lights incident?

Are UFOs inputs or outputs of the system? If they are proven as outputs, rather than inputs, wouldn't that mean we need to rethink our entire weapon assignment theory? From the control system theory it seems better to take a hostile incoming missile for a UFO than to take a UFO for a friendly aircraft. That's our challenge right now.

https://forgottenlanguages-full.forgott ... k-ufo.html