On Lyapunov Beings

[lake]

On Lyapunov Beings

Denebian Probes and the introduction of non terrestrial life to Sol-3

"In order to secure a stable population of Homo sapiens sapiens the designer needs to guarantee a slow evolutionary response since in the presence of fluctuations, stability becomes related to long time delay. Once t is fixed to that value, one can be force the evolutionary (phenotypic) rate nu for hominids to take the required value: n = 1/5.000.000 = 2 x 2-7.

Note that the solar system possesses an intrinsic noise source due to chaos and characterized by t = 5.000.000 years"

"Assuming a Denebian probe is able to detect Earth"s vegetation in the Earth integrated spectrum at visible wavelengths, we can imagine that the detection took place somewhere between 5 to 3 My ago. Green vegetation on Sol-3 has a reflectance spectrum showing a sharp increase
around 700 nm, the so-called vegetation red edge (VRE), making it a good biomarker for any deep-space exploring probe in the surroundings of the solar system."

"We know the Sahara was more vegetated than today and that its desertification is the main large-scale change in land cover for the last 6000 years, therefore we assume this made of that region an interesting observational target within the framework of the stellar seeding program, and it also makes of the Nabta Playa the place where we find the most interesting puzzles of human evolution in biological terms."

"Sol-3 observation, terraforming, and seeding is a continuous long-term program, hence it is reasonable to conclude that probes have been visiting the planet at least since the Bangui Event, some 14 Myrs ago. We also know that the propagation of the most ancient SVA type A took place about 13.5 Myrs ago, and the youngest SVA types appeared in the human genome after the chimpanzee divergence, therefore it is obvious that at least 13.5 Myrs ago one - or several - of those probes crashed in or around the Bangui-Gobero transect."

"Current research posits that insertions of members of the older SVA subtypes A-C occurred in genes involved in more primitive characteristics whereas younger SVA D-F1 insertions were present in genes linked to more sophisticated human-specific traits. Inserting SVAs in multiple human genes allows for an efficient response to an environmental stimulus. This means you need to control that stimulus targeting SVA regulatory sequences. Potential positive feedbacks in functional interactions of genes with inserted SVAS would have a larger impact on phenotype compared to if only a single gene within a pathway contained an SVA insertion. A controlled stimulus with a period of 2100 to 2500 years - like the Hallstatt cycle - matches our observations"

"Humans are clearly more susceptible to psychiatric disorders than Neanderthals; however, humans can terraform the planet autonomously,
while Neanderthals cannot. Seeding the planet with humans means you can proceed with next planet in your sequence of exploration and seeding without having to carry out the terraforming yourself. The visiting schedule would then be each 11,000 years, 22,000 years, 44,000 years, and 88,000 years. Star cluster NGC 3603, located at some 22 Klyrs from Sol-3, has the highest concentration of stars in this galaxy, thus it is clearly a place to visit, much as NGC-4590 - 44 Klyrs from Sol-3 - and SagDEC - 88 Klyrs."



"Molecular biological analyses on recovered samples have unveiled a remarkably different biology, which nonetheless shares common ancestry with all life forms on Sol-3. This means that not only does the entire biota in Sol-3 represents a single family tree: the recovered samples do also belong to that same tree."



"Sequence-based simulations of the data we have received from the Denebian probes show they characterize an unknown organism for us which however resembles the sequence for either a bacteria or an Archaean. Why would any advanced civilization send probes to a distant solar system to just send data encoding the sequence of a microbial organism? What's
could possibly be the purpose? Are they telling us they are microbial life forms themselves? I doubt it. The Darwell Hypothesis is clearly a pessimistic hypothesis; in my view they are instructing us to create the organism here on Earth by replicating its DNA sequence. Now, why? To take over the planet? I, for one, believe the reason is they are teaching us how to create a truly soil/atmosphere/oceans remediating bacteria, a life form that could terraform the Earth back to its healthy state. But you see, we need to recreate an unknown organism as per the probes' data, and this is something we simply cannot do unless we perfectly know what we are doing. So there you are, should we do it or shouldn't we?"


"We are not going to reproduce an alien organism here on Earth. Period. We don't know what the damn thing is. What if we recreate that microbe, bacteria, virus, or whatever that thing is, and it then starts replicating without we knowing how to stop it? Do we know what impact will that organism have on our planet? Do we know how it would affect our ecosystems? What if the organism turns to be life threating? We are not going to follow those new agey gurus who state the organism is a wonderful atmosphere remediating life form. Sorry, we are not taking risks here. If those guys wish to make experiments, better for them to do their experiments on, say, Mars, or Europa, or Titan. Not here."

https://forgottenlanguages-full.forgott ... s-and.html